Lahore Real Estate Forum
Start NEW Topic Or Post Advertisment
×
Close
Monday, December 15, 2025 07:58 AM
Show Past Ads From Number
1-10
Total Records:
14
Records Viewed Per Page:
10
Got to MORE Discussion or Ads on Next Page
(14)
KSA®
Wednesday, April 27, 2016 10:50 PM PST
Reply:
Please evaluate
Dear Lahore
team
please evaluate current price.
MRK
replied on Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:08 AM PST
A.O.A Everyone!
Kindly Help me out regarding the payment of Development Charges of my 5 Marla plot, Block R near Marquee which is due on end of this week (as per the discussions in this site) and till now I haven't received the intimation Letter yet! when i contacted the concerned department, no one can yet confirm whether they have dispatched the letter or not! I have even asked them if I can pay the installment charges without needing the letter but they are soo very rude and have pathetic communication skills to deal with the clients (no difference between LDA & DHA staff attitude)! they haven't provided with with any details and hanged up the phone! Even went to the Head office but no one was able to resolve my issue or even tell me the last date of my payment! I fear that DHA deliberately wants us pay with the MARK-UP even though i have the funds ready.
Now my question is what should I do? Should I wait for the letter or I can pay without the letter! what would be the procedure if I pay without the letter? I have also noticed that many forum members who own phase IX Files have already paid 2 installments while I haven't yet!
AsimIrfan
replied on Thursday, April 28, 2016 01:43 PM PST
Dear Sir,
Prism near C 1753 is around 53 to 55 lacs included 1st installment paid
Asim Irfan
Lahore Real Estate
+923224003475
Email:INFO@LREPK.Com
(13)
MRK
Friday, April 29, 2011 02:53 PM PST
Reply:
B-17
Dear Friends, any advise on B-17, Islamabad.
JAWAD
replied on Friday, April 29, 2011 03:18 PM PST
Dear LRE !
Please advise me..we are two brothers...i have a budget of 15 lac and my brother has 8 lac...we want to make a long term investment...
i have a plan to buy one file of phase 9/10 lahore
or
2 files of DHA phase 2 extn islamabad ( please tell which one is better)
my brother wants to buy one file of DHA phase 2 extn in islamabad..is it safe or there is any other good choice for him in this money...thanks
jawad
Abdul Khaliq
replied on Friday, April 29, 2011 03:28 PM PST
B 17 is good scheme and longterm and trusted cooperative company, you check status of this society on cda web site(www.cda.gov.pk), and also cheapest price, in future after completion of airport, price will be rise.
stn
replied on Friday, April 29, 2011 05:26 PM PST
dear Jawad better u puchase a 10 marla plot in Bahria town lahore and for ur brother a 5 marla plot in DHA town (phase 9).
madni
replied on Friday, April 29, 2011 10:32 PM PST
i have one corner plot in d block in b17, i want to sale,
MRK
replied on Saturday, April 30, 2011 02:23 AM PST
But any opinion on B-17 after Supreme Court Decision on E-11 and same Multi Professional society. Why recently prices were going up for B-17?
KHURRAM
replied on Saturday, April 30, 2011 08:36 PM PST
dear sir , DHA 9/10 file lahore is best investment.
( LAHORE REAL ESTATE )
Ch Farrukh
replied on Friday, May 6, 2011 02:45 PM PST
Prices of B-17 are going up. Best option for investment and ideal place to live. And supreme court decision will not affect prices of B-17. Gas supply is going to be inaugurated at 28th may. Other basic facilities are already available. Sector is ready to live.
(12)
MRK
Monday, April 18, 2011 12:09 AM PST
Reply:
Please advise, after E-11 decision by Supreme Court, B-17 is also facing the same fate?
abc123
replied on Monday, April 18, 2011 12:55 PM PST
Will it not be better?
CDA will take over full charge of the sector after paying the full expenses that MPCHS has so far incurred on development of B-17. I think the allotees will benefit from this change.
sb
replied on Monday, April 18, 2011 02:52 PM PST
CDA dosn't have a penny to pay.
atiq raja.
replied on Monday, April 18, 2011 10:11 PM PST
high up game,every think is settled,the decision came after completion certificate,any how good news for e/11 residents and bad news for e/12, g/12 and f/12 because last hope for development of these sectors with help of private partner ship is now closed.
MRK
replied on Tuesday, April 19, 2011 10:21 AM PST
But what about B-17?
(11)
Islamabad Property News
Saturday, April 16, 2011 02:55 PM PST
Reply:
Islamabad Property News
اسلام آباد - سپریم کورٹ نے اسلام آباد کے سیکٹر ای الیون میں زمین کی آبادکاری کے حوالے سے ملٹی پروفیشنل ہاؤسنگ سوسائٹی اور سی ڈی اے کے درمیان ہونے والے معاہدے کو کالعدم قرار دے دیا ہے اور سی ڈی اے بورڈ کو ہدایت کی ہے کہ وہ تمام منصوبے کو اپنے قبضے میں لے لے اور آرڈیننس کی مشقوں کے مطابق اس منصوبے کو مکمل کیا جائے۔ چیئرمین سی ڈی اے سپریم کورٹ کی ہدایات پر عملدرآمد کو یقینی بنائے اور ایک ماہ کے اندر رپورٹ پیش کرے جبکہ عدالت نے کہا کہ اگر ملٹی پروفیشنل ہاؤسنگ سوسائٹی نے اس پراجیکٹ پر رقم خرچ کی ہے تو انہیں قانون کے مطابق اس رقم کی وصولی کیلئے چارہ جوئی کا اختیار حاصل ہو گا۔ واضح رہے کہ سپریم کورٹ نے سی ڈی اے اور ملٹی پروفیشنل ہاؤسنگ سوسائٹی کے مابین سیکٹر ای 11میں 54 ایکڑ اراضی کی روانگی کیلئے دسمبر 2008ء میں ہونیوالے معاہدے کیخلاف ازخودنوٹس لیا تھا۔ سوسائٹی کا عدالت میں کہنا تھا کہ اس نے اس معاہدے کے تحت زمین کی آبادکاری کی مد میں بھاری رقم خرچ کی ہے جس پر عدالت نے ان کو اس بات کی اجازت دیدی ہے کہ وہ اپنی رقم کی وصولی کے لئے قانون کے مطابق چارہ جوئی کر سکتے ہیں۔ اس کیس کی سماعت چیف جسٹس کی سربراہی میں دو رکنی بنچ نے کی۔
Saad Rafique
replied on Saturday, April 16, 2011 04:26 PM PST
Mr. Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhary
The Honorable Chief Justice of Pakistan
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Very respected Sir,
I humbly request your kind attention to please probe into the matter related to Supreme Court Employees Cooperating Housing Society in G-17 Islamabad
jk
replied on Saturday, April 16, 2011 04:33 PM PST
Where are all these E-11 lovers today and what are there comment on E-11 at this stage and on it's lower standard design / works
I repeatedly said that E-11 is a "dwarf Sector" and can not be called a proper CDA sector.
where as they were putting E-11 ahead of sector D-12.
E-16 Rp housing
replied on Saturday, April 16, 2011 05:09 PM PST
Dear Mr. JK what are your comments on E-16 Rp housing Society?
Please share if you have info about tha
jk
replied on Saturday, April 16, 2011 06:31 PM PST
What to comment on E-16 apart from this that Rawalpindi Housing Society started in 1986 and it is like a tree trying to grow in barren Land. Where cattle come too for grazing in meadows and you never know some one may pulls this plant from roots one day.
in simple it is hopeless
Amjad
replied on Saturday, April 16, 2011 07:59 PM PST
Very wrong decision of SC, these were the societies who developed this patchy sector, cda even could not get the possession of land from occupents of cda land, mpchs had developed the cda land, paid the compensation to occupents and now this commercial area will never be constructed by the cda. Cda even could not completely develop D-12 in 20 years time. I condemn this decision of SC.
Waseem Malik
replied on Saturday, April 16, 2011 09:17 PM PST
I wonder why SCP is taking decisions about Capital land issues in bits and pieces. There was a decree about Bani Gala couple of months ago and now its E-11. Why not outlining a working āstrategyā for the Capital as a whole. Why not one clear message to CDA for all development work which is its core responsibility. By the way āstrategiesā are already laid out on papers, SCP only have to give reminders to CDA with supreme authority. So why not a ruling on overall behavior of CDA who is culprit of extreme development delays in Islamabad at criminal level. After all, we are talking about āSupremeā Court of Pakistan. Why picking up just one sector and making rulings about it. Why not clear message to those who are occupying state land illegally and openly committing crime and to those authorities (CDA) who are culprit of delaying tactics and causing a serious social and economic problems in the Capital of Pakistan.
MRK
replied on Monday, April 18, 2011 12:12 AM PST
Please advise,after SC decision about E-11, B-17 is also expected to face the same fate?
Ch
replied on Monday, April 25, 2011 07:57 PM PST
Very Bad decision by Supreme Court. Major fault in this decision is that SCP didn't understand till end of its hearing that MPCHS is not a private firm or a property of a single person. It is a co-operative society where members are the owners of their assets. Hard earned money of poor people was involved by MPCHS to develop a CDA Project. CDA could not get possession of the land till 10 years more. Any how its a honor for MPCHS that they are the Developers of Northern Strip of E-11. MPCHS is innocent in this case.
(10)
Sami Khan
Thursday, January 25, 2007 08:14 AM PST
Reply:
i have been noticing rapid recovery of phase V extension...which is good for file holders....
can anyone tell me what is the reason for this recent rise? is it a good investment at this point?
Jehanzeb
replied on Thursday, January 25, 2007 09:30 AM PST
Balloting for this files is coming around the corner.
mrk
replied on Thursday, January 25, 2007 01:51 PM PST
Will request CMY Sahib to comment on that.
His candid response would be very helpful.
HTML code is disabled
Got to MORE Discussion or Ads on Next Page